His first public appearance was on a panel titled “White Collar Crime in a High-Tech World.” But he was in office for two years, too few to really make an impact. Anderson, a Trump appointee, had talked about making Silicon Valley a priority for his prosecutors. None of the questions from the host or from callers dealt with Silicon Valley. attorney for the Northern District of California early this year, he did an interview with a radio station. 11 attacks brought fears of widespread terrorism.Īnd for all the growing awareness of the power of tech companies, there is little public demand to hold them accountable. Fighting white-collar crime has been less of a priority for the Department of Justice since the Sept. Few prosecutors come to the Bay Area to make their reputations, and those that do - like Robert Mueller 20 years ago - soon move on to better jobs. There are a lot of complicated reasons for this shortage of courtroom action.Ī frequent explanation is that it is the fault of a lackluster U.S. Not every white-collar case is a tech case or related to start-ups, which means there are only a handful of times each year when someone in Silicon Valley is accused of a crime. Holmes’s lawyers, said in his opening statement at the trial’s start in September. “The reality of what happened at Theranos is far, far more complicated than what you have heard about Elizabeth Holmes so far,” Lance Wade, another of Ms. Holmes’s defense team has tried making the case that there was some truth to what Ms. In some of the examples, Theranos was paid for its work in the studies. Holmes’s understanding of Theranos’s technology was that “it performed well,” she testified. He did not mention the name of the journal. Holmes’s lawyer, also showed what he called a peer-reviewed journal that published the results of a study that Theranos did with Stanford University around this time. One exhibit displayed internal documentation about the success of some of this early work and showed a map of around a dozen cities around the world where Theranos’s machines were used for studies. Holmes testified about studies that Theranos did with Merck, AstraZeneca, Centocor, Bristol Myers Squibb and others in 20. (Pfizer’s representative said the company had come to the opposite conclusion.) Nor had they approved of having their logos added to the reports. Read moreĪ Theranos report implied endorsements from pharmaceutical companies including Schering-Plough and Pfizer.īut representatives from Pfizer and Schering-Plough testified that their companies had never validated Theranos’s technology. Holmes testified for a second day and her defense began taking shape. On Monday, the courtroom was packed as Ms. And the more dedicated spectators who hadn’t yet trickled out for the weekend sat up straight, craning to see Ms. Reporters sent panicked messages to their editors. Holmes’s testimony on Friday afternoon sent a jolt of adrenaline through the sleepy room. When exhibits are displayed on two large monitors on the sides of the room, those paying attention squint and lean in to read. Regular attendees bring seat cushions for the hard wood benches - and to save their seats during breaks. Reporters type carefully on laptops, wary of warnings from the judge that they must have a “silent keyboard.” One juror has complained that clacking noise from keyboards was distracting. Everyone in the courtroom wears a mask except those testifying. Holmes’s partner, Billy Evans, is sometimes among them.Īttendees are assigned tickets for a limited number of seats, spaced out as a pandemic precaution. Behind her in the gallery, her mother, Noel, typically sits in a reserved row with a rotating group of family and friends who have come in a show of support.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |